SHOCKING REVELATION: Were the New Orleans Bombs Nuclear?

In what seems like a scene straight out of an apocalyptic movie, the New Year’s Day attack in New Orleans has catapulted into the realm of conspiracy theories, with some voices on the internet questioning if the explosive used was of nuclear nature. Here’s what we know so far, pieced together from various sources, and why some are not buying the official story.

On January 1, 2025, tragedy struck in the heart of New Orleans when Shamsud-Din Jabbar drove a vehicle into a crowd on Bourbon Street, leading to 14 deaths and numerous injuries. The FBI quickly labeled it an act of terrorism, linked to Jabbar’s ISIS sympathies. Alongside the vehicular assault, two explosive devices were found, which fortunately did not detonate.

According to reports, the explosive compound used by Jabbar was described by officials as “very rare,” sparking curiosity and skepticism among conspiracy theorists. The explosive has reportedly never been used in a U.S. or European terrorist attack before, raising the question: what exactly was it?

Official Stance: The explosive is not nuclear; rather, it’s a rare compound whose specifics haven’t been fully disclosed, leading to speculation. The FBI and other law enforcement agencies have confirmed that the lack of explosion was due to the bombs not being properly assembled or triggered, not because they were duds by design.

Conspiracy Theories: Some netizens, particularly on platforms like X, have speculated wildly about the nature of this explosive. Theories range from it being a miniaturized nuclear device to a new type of chemical explosive unknown to the public. These theories gain traction from the lack of detailed information released about the explosive, feeding into narratives about government cover-ups or the testing of new, undisclosed weaponry.

The idea of a nuclear component might seem far-fetched, but here’s why some believe it:

Lack of Specifics: The FBI’s reticence to specify the exact explosive raises eyebrows. If it’s not nuclear, why not clarify?

Radiation Concerns: No reports of radiation have surfaced, but conspiracy theorists argue that if it were a nuclear explosive, any radiation could have been quickly contained or covered up.

The Scale of Destruction: The attack’s impact was significant but not consistent with known conventional explosives’ capabilities at the scene, leading some to question if something more potent was intended.

Expert Opinions: Security experts and chemists have dismissed the nuclear theory based on the lack of radiological evidence and the physical aftermath which doesn’t match nuclear detonation patterns.

Investigation Findings: The FBI’s investigation points towards a homemade bomb with non-nuclear components, focusing on the radicalization of Jabbar rather than the development of new weaponry.

Logical Analysis: The absence of widespread panic, evacuations, or long-term health advisories in New Orleans post-attack further diminishes the plausibility of nuclear involvement.

While the New Orleans attack was undeniably horrific, the leap to nuclear weaponry seems more a product of fear, misinformation, and the internet’s love for sensationalism than grounded in evidence. The explosive was indeed rare, but all signs point towards it being a chemical compound, not a nuclear device. As the investigation continues, the public is urged to rely on verified information rather than speculation that can mislead and incite unnecessary panic.

Remember, in the world of conspiracies, the truth often lies in what’s not said, but sometimes, it’s just not that complicated.