Judge Blocks Biden From Auctioning Off Wall:

Oh, the sweet irony! In a delicious twist of fate, a Trump-appointed judge, Drew Tipton, has thrown a wrench in the Biden administration’s last-ditch efforts to rid itself of border wall materials. Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton, clearly reveling in this moment, declared a “victory” for Trump’s border security agenda, after the Biden administration sheepishly agreed to halt their little auction party for the next 30 days.

Paxton, in a statement dripping with glee, accused Biden of not only violating a federal court order but also of trying to sabotage Trump’s grand wall plans right before he reclaims the White House. He’s practically rubbing his hands together, claiming that this move is a clear attempt by Biden to undermine Trump’s immigration policies.

The Biden admin, caught with their pants down, confirmed they’d stop the disposal of these wall parts, which, let’s be honest, were probably being sold for pennies on the dollar. Paxton’s office had a field day with this, noting that the materials were being auctioned off at a fraction of their cost, a move they argue is not just wasteful but possibly criminal.

In their legal tussle, Paxton and Missouri AG Andrew Bailey are going after Biden for ignoring a 2020 law that earmarked $1.4 billion for border security. It’s like watching a schoolyard scuffle where one side is caught cheating and now has to sit out.

Trump, apparently “deeply troubled” (read: livid) by these reports, has been vocal about how these materials, sold at what he calls “rock-bottom prices,” might come back to haunt his administration at an inflated cost. It’s almost like watching a bad investment turn into a worse one.

And let’s not forget the cherry on top: William McKerall from the Texas Facilities Commission has called out the federal government’s “disposal process” as being as shoddy as a poorly constructed wall itself.

So here we are, with the Biden administration forced to keep their hands off the wall materials, all while Paxton and co. bask in this judicial checkmate. It’s a classic case of Schadenfreude, where the downfall of one’s political opponents is not just satisfying but also publicly humiliating.