The Secret Evil Taxpayer Burden: USAID Pays George Soros to Live Large and Create Unrest in America

Date: February 5, 2025

In an era where the lines between philanthropy, political activism, and governmental policy blur, the relationship between the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) and George Soros’ Open Society Foundations (OSF) raises profound questions about the use of American taxpayer money. This investigation delves into how funds flow from USAID to Soros-linked entities, exploring allegations of corruption, the funding of protests, and how these activities might be influencing both domestic and international landscapes.

The Funding Pipeline:

• USAID to OSF: Historical documents and recent reports indicate that USAID has been a conduit for millions of dollars to OSF. From the 1990s, USAID has collaborated with Soros’ foundations, particularly in Eastern Europe and the former Soviet Union, to promote democracy and civil society. However, the scope and nature of this partnership have expanded over the years.
• Global Impact: In countries like Macedonia, Albania, and Ukraine, USAID funds have been directed towards Soros’ organizations to ostensibly support democratic movements. However, local politicians and critics have accused these funds of being used to destabilize governments or fund protests against conservative regimes.
• U.S. Domestic Influence: More controversially, there are assertions that some of this money indirectly supports activities within the United States. While direct funding to domestic political activities is not legally permissible, the complex web of Soros’ philanthropy allows for indirect support through various NGOs and fiscal sponsors:
  • Prosecutor Elections: There’s been significant focus on Soros’ influence in funding progressive district attorney candidates across the U.S., with claims that USAID indirectly supports these through funding to organizations like the Tides Foundation, which then sponsors Soros-backed groups.
  • Protests and Advocacy: Funding for protests, particularly those associated with movements like Black Lives Matter or climate activism, has been linked to Soros’ networks. Although these are often supported through complex funding mechanisms, the money can trace back to U.S. government agencies like USAID, given their international grants that benefit Soros’ global network.

Allegations of Graft and Corruption:

• Transparency Issues: USAID’s funding to Soros entities has been criticized for a lack of transparency. Critics argue that the complexity of these financial arrangements hides the true extent of U.S. taxpayer involvement in what could be seen as foreign or domestic political engineering.
• Corruption Allegations: There are concerns that funds meant for development or humanitarian aid have been misused to push political agendas. In Albania, for instance, funds were allegedly used to influence judicial reforms in favor of Soros’ interests.
• Legal Challenges: Groups like Judicial Watch have filed numerous FOIA lawsuits to uncover the specifics of these financial transactions, revealing in some instances that USAID money was used in ways that could be construed as supporting Soros’ political objectives over neutral aid.

The Domestic Angle:

• Funding Soros in the U.S.: While direct domestic funding from USAID to Soros’ initiatives is not documented, the indirect support through international programs that bolster Soros’ networks is a point of contention. This includes:
  • Influence on Elections: By funding organizations that in turn support political campaigns or advocacy groups, there’s an indirect influence on U.S. elections and policy, particularly in local races like those for district attorneys where Soros has been notably active.
  • Social Movements: Movements for social justice, environmental causes, or immigration reform often receive support from Soros-funded groups, which might benefit from international funding loops.

Audit and Oversight:

• Need for Scrutiny: Despite calls from various political figures for an audit of USAID’s funding, comprehensive, public audits are rare. The lack of detailed public records on these transactions fuels speculation and criticism.
• Political Reactions: The Trump administration’s 90-day funding pause in 2025 aimed at restructuring USAID included halting funds that could potentially support Soros’ activities, highlighting the political sensitivity of these connections.

Public and Political Backlash:

• Social Media Outcry: Posts on X reflect a significant portion of the American public questioning the ethics of using taxpayer money to fund what some see as political activism or corruption overseas and at home.
• Legislative Pushback: There have been attempts by U.S. lawmakers to investigate or legislate changes in how USAID can allocate funds, aiming to prevent what is perceived as indirect support for domestic political causes.

Conclusion:

The flow of U.S. taxpayer money through USAID to George Soros’ organizations paints a complex picture of international aid intertwined with political influence. While the mission of promoting democracy and civil society is noble, the lack of transparency and the potential for funds to be redirected towards domestic political activities or to support protests both abroad and at home raises legitimate concerns about corruption, accountability, and the ethical use of public funds. As the debate continues, it’s clear that more rigorous oversight and transparency are needed to ensure that American dollars serve American interests, both at home and abroad.