The New Orleans and Las Vegas Incidents: A Deep State Conspiracy ?

In the wake of two harrowing attacks on New Year’s Day, questions are swirling around the possibility of a deeper, more sinister orchestration behind the scenes. On January 1, 2025, a vehicle plowed into crowds in New Orleans, killing 15 and injuring dozens, while hours later, a Tesla Cybertruck exploded outside the Trump International Hotel in Las Vegas, resulting in one death and seven injuries.

Both incidents have been officially labeled as terrorism, with the New Orleans attack linked to a suspect displaying ISIS affiliations. Shamsud-Din Jabbar, a 42-year-old US Army veteran, was identified as the perpetrator in New Orleans, where an ISIS flag was found in his vehicle alongside improvised explosive devices. Meanwhile, in Las Vegas, Matthew Livelsberger, another former military man from Colorado Springs, was at the helm of the Cybertruck explosion, adding a layer of complexity to the narrative due to the involvement of Elon Musk’s flagship vehicle.

The speculative theory gaining traction on social media platforms like X posits these attacks as potential “false flag” operations by elements within the government, colloquially referred to as the “Deep State,” aimed at influencing or destabilizing the incoming Trump administration. The theory’s proponents argue that the timing, alongside the involvement of a Cybertruck, could be an attempt to undermine Musk’s close ties with Trump, especially considering Musk’s recent appointment to a significant advisory role.

Coordination and Timing: The proximity in time between the New Orleans and Las Vegas attacks, both involving vehicles rented through the same car-sharing app, Turo, suggests to some a possible coordinated effort. The fact that both suspects had served at the same military base further fuels this speculation.

The Cybertruck Factor: The explosion of a Tesla Cybertruck, a vehicle symbolic of Elon Musk’s vision, outside a Trump-owned property, could be interpreted as a direct attack on the relationship between these two influential figures. Posts on X have highlighted the symbolic nature of this event, potentially aimed at discrediting Musk or the Trump administration’s policies on technology and security.

Historical Precedence: Conspiracy theorists often cite historical instances where governments have allegedly staged or exaggerated events to sway public opinion or policy. The term “false flag” is used to describe operations where an attack is made to appear as though it’s by another group to justify certain actions or policies.

Official Investigations: Both the FBI and local law enforcement have been clear in their statements, indicating ongoing investigations into potential terrorist links without confirming any conspiracy. The presence of ISIS symbols and the radicalization of Jabbar point towards genuine terrorist intent rather than a staged event.

Motive and Methods: While the involvement of a Cybertruck might seem like a deliberate choice to link Musk to the incident, there’s no solid evidence suggesting this was anything beyond the vehicle being a convenient tool for the attack. The use of rented vehicles from the same company in both incidents might just be coincidental or indicative of vulnerabilities in vehicle-sharing systems rather than orchestrated chaos.

Lack of Direct Evidence: No concrete evidence has emerged to support the false flag theory. The discussions on social media platforms often lack factual backing and are driven by skepticism towards government narratives.

While the theory of these attacks being false flags orchestrated by the Deep State to influence the Trump administration is compelling to those already skeptical of government actions, it remains speculative without direct evidence. The official narrative leans towards these being acts of terrorism by individuals with radical affiliations. However, the involvement of a high-profile vehicle like the Cybertruck does invite scrutiny, especially in an era where technology and politics are deeply intertwined.

As investigations continue, the public is left to ponder the implications of these events, whether they are isolated acts of terror or part of a more complex scheme. The truth, if it ever fully surfaces, will undoubtedly be shaped by the narratives we choose to believe or question.